# team.management — compare

> team.management vs GitHub Spec Kit, Superpowers, gstack, Claude Task Master, BMAD Method, Beads, OpenSpec, cc-sessions, autoresearch, claude-code-setup — and the AI coding subscriptions side by side, with a date on every number.

- [Compare](https://team.management/compare.md): team.management vs GitHub Spec Kit, Superpowers, gstack, Claude Task Master, BMAD Method, Beads, OpenSpec, cc-sessions, autoresearch, claude-code-setup — and the AI coding subscriptions side by side, with a date on every number.
- [team.management vs GitHub Spec Kit](https://team.management/compare/team-management-vs-github-spec-kit.md): GitHub Spec Kit vs team.management: spec-driven documents vs runtime process enforcement for Claude Code — what each one actually stops, and why the two compose well together.
- [team.management vs Superpowers](https://team.management/compare/team-management-vs-superpowers.md): Superpowers vs team.management: both promise engineering discipline for Claude Code. Superpowers works through structured instructions; team.management gates tool calls in the runtime.
- [team.management vs gstack](https://team.management/compare/team-management-vs-gstack.md): gstack vs team.management: Garry Tan’s 23 role-skills turn Claude Code into a virtual team; team.management makes the team’s process enforceable. Which failure mode is yours?
- [team.management vs Claude Task Master](https://team.management/compare/team-management-vs-claude-task-master.md): Claude Task Master vs team.management for Claude Code task management: PRD-to-task-graph decomposition vs an enforced task lifecycle with DAIC gates, branches, and review.
- [team.management vs BMAD Method](https://team.management/compare/team-management-vs-bmad-method.md): BMAD Method vs team.management: 12+ agent personas and PRD ceremony vs an enforced protocol lifecycle inside Claude Code. Which discipline model fits your work?
- [team.management vs Beads](https://team.management/compare/team-management-vs-beads.md): Beads vs team.management: Steve Yegge’s git-backed issue graph gives agents memory across sessions; team.management enforces the process within them. Use both.
- [team.management vs OpenSpec](https://team.management/compare/team-management-vs-openspec.md): OpenSpec vs team.management: lightweight spec-driven workflow vs enforced protocol lifecycle for Claude Code. Same instinct — discipline without ceremony — different layer.
- [team.management vs cc-sessions](https://team.management/compare/team-management-vs-cc-sessions.md): cc-sessions vs team.management: the original DAIC hooks harness is dormant since October 2025. team.management carries the same DNA forward as a maintained protocol engine.
- [team.management vs autoresearch](https://team.management/compare/team-management-vs-autoresearch.md): autoresearch by Andrej Karpathy vs team.management’s optimize protocols: autonomous overnight experimentation — and what changes when the loop runs on an enforced, engine-measured lifecycle instead of Markdown instructions.
- [team.management vs claude-code-setup](https://team.management/compare/team-management-vs-claude-code-setup.md): claude-code-setup vs team.management: Anthropic’s official plugin recommends hooks, skills, and subagents for your project; team.management is the protocol engine that enforces the process they serve. They compose.
- [Claude Code vs Codex (July 2026)](https://team.management/compare/claude-code-vs-codex.md): Claude Code vs OpenAI Codex in July 2026: subscription tiers, session and weekly limits, credit systems, and API fallbacks compared with primary sources — plus the case for running both on one process.
- [Antigravity vs Claude Code (July 2026)](https://team.management/compare/antigravity-vs-claude-code.md): Google Antigravity vs Claude Code in July 2026: Google AI subscription tiers and credit bundles vs Claude plans and session limits — sourced, dated, including the quota history.
- [AI coding subscriptions compared (July 2026)](https://team.management/compare/ai-coding-subscriptions.md): Every major AI coding subscription in one table, July 2026: Claude, ChatGPT/Codex, Google AI/Antigravity, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf — prices, credit models, limits, and run-out behavior, with primary sources.